Stories from the world of RC car racing

If you haven’t caught the news already, ORRCA Queensland have announced some new rules effective immediately for ORRCA sanctioned events.  Before we go any further, let’s just be sure and understand that these rules ONLY apply to the ORRCA Queensland Championships. Clubs and other race organisers are free to run their own races to their own rules.  Here’s a summary of the new rules, and my own thoughts:
1. Weights for modified: Modified touring cars are now able to run 4, 5 or 6 cell batteries with appropriate weight limit reductions.  So it’s 1525 for 6 cells, 1450 for 5 cells and 1375 for 4 cells (all with timing equipment on board).
In my opinion this isn’t a bad rule change. We’ve seen it already nationally under the AARCMCC ruless, and locally for the interclub series. I think they could safely have ignore the 4-cell option as early experiments in Japan late in 2006 demonstrated that 4-cell is not the way to go.  5-cell cars will start to appear in modified and will be turning at least as quick  lap times as 6-cell cars on most SEQ tracks. Personally I’ll mostly likely be sticking with 6-cells because I share batteries with Dad who races stock in both touring cars, 4wd and 2wd offroad – so 5-cell is not a viable option for us right now.
2. Stop & Go Penalty:  ORRCA give race directors now the option to give competitors a stop/go penalty for any on-track indiscretion (like corner cutting, or rough driving) where the driver does not redress any advantage gained.  previously ORRCA rules allowed only the issuing of a warning, which basically meant that if you were so inclined, you could hack someone, get the position and simply receive a warning. Not much of a penalty!
In my opinion this is a good rule change.  I’ve often thought the warning system not much of a penalty, and a stop/go (where the competitor has to bring their car to complete stop in a nominated penalty box usually in pit-lane) will be a much more effective system.  It’s important that race directors/referees and competitors understand that the option for the stop-go is only when the competitor doesn’t redress any advantage. if you accidentallly hit someone, stop and let them go back in front and you won’t get a stop-go. Easy!
3. ORRCA Qld “Time Window”:  This rule enforces an exclusion zone around ORRCA Qld EP on-road and off-road championships – directing ORRCA affiliated clubs not to run another state or national championship event within 4 weeks either side of an ORRCA sanctioned event. Penalty is loss of insurance and affiliation the following year.
In my opinion this is a bizarre ruling.  This is a “big stick” approach to a non-existent problem.  It also is unclear how it will work. If a club runs a GP offroad AARCMCC Qld titles in mid-May (when the 1/8 offroad event is traditionally held) that event will be within four weeks  of the Qld EP Off-road championship. Seems strange to invoke the ban. Similarly, let’s say Brendale (for example) runs the GP on-road Nationals late October within 4-weeks of the Qld EP on-road event. Again, they woudl face penalty under this system.  I don’t get it at all, and can’t really understand the need for it.
What I imagine might be happening is that another sanctioning body might be trying to get a EP Qld Championships event up and running, and could ask a club to run it in opposition to the traditional event. That would suck.
4. 540 for Juniors: Not just announced, but for 2007, 540 is for drivers aged 16 and under by 31/12/2007 with older drivers running in stock or modified.
In my opinion this is quite ok, and is obviously aimed at bringing more junior drivers into the sport – something that in most clubs is sadly lacking. If it works, congrats ORRCA Qld.  I continue to be puzzled by 540, with drivers with years of experience, and masses of equipment opting to trophy hunt in 540 at events like interclub (say the recent Logan Winter Cup for example).  we should change the name of the class to “Junior Stock” or “Beginners Class” or something – surely no self-respecting experienced driver with masses of equipment wants to win the “beginner class” championship!

7 responses to “New Rules for Queensland”

  1. tones Avatar

    dropping the 4 cell option probably wouldn’t be a bad idea as it would be one less thing people might feel compelled to test with.
    to me the reedy race proved the concept of combining 5 and 6 cell with a weight concession for 5 cell.
    ditto on the penatly box – long over due.
    hadn’t given it much thought but those are some valid reasons for a rethink. i wonder if there being a qld on-road title on the aarcmcc calander has something to do with this?
    either great minds think alike… or you stole my idea! 🙂
    inspiried by the japanese system of naming classes after their participants (novice their 540 equivalent, sportsman is their stock and expert their modified).
    i really think the psycological approach could work.

    Like

  2. scott Avatar

    After thinking further on the 540 rules earlier today, I think a combination of age/experience might work.
    Essentially, accept 540 entries from anybody aged 16 or under, plus anybody who has competed in less than 2 State or National events (irrespective of class or scale). Anyone who has been around long enough to have run 2 State/National events has the skills to progress beyond 540. Anyone transferring to EP touring from other scales has the experience – EP540 tourers are the most underpowered and over-gripped class in all of R/C.
    Or I think somebody else suggested dumping 540 altogether and adding 19T as the “new” intermediate class. Can’t say I’m personally in favour of that as very few clubs run regular 19T racing, plus I really like the idea of young and inexperienced drivers getting a taste of championship racing – it all improves the breed (so to speak).

    Like

  3. Robert Avatar
    Robert

    540 issue- Every other sports have rankings (eg Tennis – you get skill tested and then put into a division)
    Why not do this with all clubs. With restrictions for 540 only. Like the club has set rules (eg/ no age limit, maybe equipment limit like no tyre warmers, maybe un-matched cells) and then the club decides who go where. This keeping it all fair. If you don’t meet the requirements/skill for 540 you don’t race it.
    Robert.

    Like

  4. john h Avatar
    john h

    Time window is for EP on and off road only, to protect the club who’s running the ORRCA Qld titles.
    I like the idea of a name change from 540 to novice, grading system if someone wants to do it and convince me it will work, may be looked at.

    Like

  5. john h Avatar
    john h

    No offers yet.

    Like

  6. scott Avatar

    My suggestion for the novice grading system is in my comment two above your initial comment John. I already passed this on through Leonard.
    For entrants into Novice class, an additional quesiton on entry form for over 16 y/olds:
    “Have you previously entered any Queensland, other State or National championships for R/C Cars? IF yes, what class/scale and year?”
    So two ways to enter novice class. 1 – 16 and under. 2. limited experience at big races.

    Like

  7. scott Avatar

    A grading system wouldn’t be too difficult to set up. Allocate points on a 100 for 1st, to 0 for 100th basis. Allocate poitns for all major queensland races (eg queensland champs, interclub series, logan summer cup, north queensland inter-city series). That should give about 8 or 9 events per annum. Drivers best 4 or 5 pointscores count with Qld Championship counting as two race meetings.
    We managed a driver ranking system like this in the mid-90’s for state and national rankins for EP offroad without too much trouble.

    Like

Leave a reply to john h Cancel reply

Action RC

Welcome to Action RC, a home of stories from the world of RC car racing.

Listen to the Action RC Podcast, read race reports and previews, the latest in product reviews or our regular opinion and reflection pieces.

Contact us for content requests or more information.