Stories from the world of RC car racing

AARCMCC have announced this week that effective immediately, modified touring cars in Australia will feature a mixture of 4, 5 and 6 cell cars.  4 & 5 cell competitors will get a weight break, running at 1375 or 1450 grams respectively (including timing equipment).  The changes are said by AARCMCC to be in response to the high frequency of motor/speedo failures in the modified class.
AARCMCC’s announcement (here) makes room for a review of the situation every 6 months to allow for improvements in technology removing the need for the arrangements, or to respond to changes in international rules.
It’s an interesting move and one bound to provoke controversy.  The changes have been made by the AARCMCC executive with no reference to member clubs (the usual protocol for AARCMCC) and just a couple of months before the National titles.
It throws a massive complexity into the mix with serious modified drivers now likely to want to test 4, 5 and 6 cell configuration on any given track to look for the best performing combo.  On a big track like Brendale, presumably 6 cell will still be the best choice – but that will only be confirmed by testing other options.  At other tracks, the situation will be much less clear.
Less difficult, (but still important) will be the job of scrutineers and event organisers staying in touch with which competitors are to be running at which weight.
It is worth noting that this has immediate impact only on sanction AARCMCC events. The Queensland championships later this month are not affected, as they run to ORRCA Qld rules.
In my view it’s a decision that has potential, but should have been implemented in consultation with racers and clubs.  It should also have started from 1/1/2007 at the earliest. I support the investigation into 4 or 5 cell racing, but changing the playing field this close to the Nats is a bizarre decision. 
The new/developing brushless technology also seems to be going some way toward dealing with the motor/speedy failures (at least for brushless motor users), but again, we are still yet to run in an Australian summer.
All this aside, it will be interesting to see what transpires. There are some lining up already to run 4 or 5 cell at the nats and take advantage of crazy motors like Novak’s Velociti 3.5 and the lighter weight limits.
So that’s what I think. Interesting decision, weird timing, strange process, complex (and costly?) consequences.

5 responses to “4/5 Cell Goes Live…..Interesting?”

  1. Heavy Avatar

    One of the side benefits, may be, that we may now have a stepping stone for people wanting to transit from Stock to Mod. Not that I’ve tried it, but I assume that 4 cell and then 5 cell might be easier to come to terms with than jumping straight to 6 cell Mod !

    Like

  2. anthony Avatar
    anthony

    its not the only rule they’ve changed by themselfs either this close to the nationals.
    its almost pointless to allow 4 and 5 cell along side 6. the idea of 4 cell has nothing to do with reducing speed but is purely to cut costs which wont happen if 6 cell is still allowed along side it.
    it probably wont affect the pointy end of the nationals due to the nature of the track 6 cell will be faster. it’ll just make scruitineering more of a hassle for the VOLENTEER that has to deal with it. but i guess what’s done is done.
    post nationals is different.. hopefully it’ll inspire more people to test with fewer cells. i’m still keen on doing some more serious testing with 4 cells after the nationals.

    Like

  3. Jaybo Avatar
    Jaybo

    indeed… it’s a nice rule to allow people to test stuff post-nats… but as a rulechange before the nats, it’s just pointless.

    Like

  4. Peter D Avatar
    Peter D

    I feel your pain Jay…… it’s not a good change (being soo late)…. : (

    Like

  5. Scott Harris Avatar
    Scott Harris

    The rule was made with the best of intentions (to save people blowing stuff up), but it was made at the wrong time and in the wrong way (and the rule itself – well, personally I think it goes the wrong way allowing 4, 5 and 6 alongside each other, but it’s largely irrelevant how good the rule is). It does raise some serious questions about how things get legalised, why, and when.
    It should have been put to a vote. The rules by which AARCMCC govern are there to make the decision making transparent and decisions made with the agreement of the majority of affiliated clubs – not to provide unilateral decision making ability for one or two guys who reckon a major change like this might be a good thing, LET ALONE at such short notice before the nats. It’s plain stupid.
    We will have our opportunity to vote on the AARCMCC leadership at the AGM at the nats this year. If anyone feels strongly enough about this, now is the time to think about what you want to do about it.
    -Scott

    Like

Leave a comment

Action RC

Welcome to Action RC, a home of stories from the world of RC car racing.

Listen to the Action RC Podcast, read race reports and previews, the latest in product reviews or our regular opinion and reflection pieces.

Contact us for content requests or more information.